|
Post by jackoffking on Aug 16, 2010 22:02:20 GMT
No matter how high I get above the banking limit the bot won't back. It always says Banking: False.
|
|
|
Post by Jordan on Aug 16, 2010 22:06:03 GMT
Is it reading your chips properly?
Is your bank high set to your desired amount?
Are you waiting for at least a few hands before taking over?
Does it have a chance (only banks pre-flop, so won't bank on tables with a small amount of players - also goes through a no game loop before banking.)?
|
|
|
Post by jackoffking on Aug 16, 2010 22:19:46 GMT
The chip information in the tooltip is accurate, so I assume that it is reading the chips correctly. The bank high is set to the desired amount, which is 15xBB. I have waited for at least five hands. Sometimes I won't watch the bot and come back a lot later and see that it didn't bank. Where it says Since Last Bank, the number is always 0 or a negative number. It folds on preflop and goes through a no-game loop, but still doesn't bank.
|
|
|
Post by jackoffking on Aug 16, 2010 23:38:44 GMT
I found out what the problem was. I got a hint when I noticed that it always said that there were nine players at the table, when there weren't. I was previously playing at 80k tables then moved to 200k tables. The tables are the same, so the bot will sit and play, but the background is different. That's what was causing it not to recognize how many players were at the table as well as the banking problem. I re-recorded seats at a 200k table and the problem was fixed.
|
|
|
Post by fleetfanatic on Aug 16, 2010 23:54:21 GMT
The bot never used to sit at all if your seats were recorded on a different background.
Anyway. won't matter in beta.
|
|
|
Post by Jordan on Aug 17, 2010 0:28:32 GMT
Where it says Since Last Bank, the number is always 0 or a negative number. It folds on preflop and goes through a no-game loop, but still doesn't bank. Still doesn't explain this. The background will affect the opponent reading, but not the banking in relation to chips.
|
|
|
Post by fleetfanatic on Aug 17, 2010 3:22:58 GMT
Indeed, all sounds bollocks to me. More chance of somebody working for NASA.
|
|